The LLM Structural Crisis: Solving Context Decay with the AI Memory Prosthesis
-
Moe Hachem - November 16, 2025
When building complex systems with Large Language Models, I realized that the real crisis was not the model’s intelligence, it was the architecture.
The problem is what I describe as the Cognitive Mirage: LLMs appear coherent and capable, yet they forget critical constraints as the project grows. This leads to context drift, re-teaching overhead, and eventual collapse around the 200-prompt mark.
The AI Memory Prosthesis
The AI Memory Prosthesis is my proposed solution to this structural failure.
It’s an architectural pattern called Simulated Recall via Shallow Indexing (SR-SI) that forces the model to rely on an external, highly compressed “memory layer” instead of depending on conversation history.
This gives the system structural stability, allowing it to reconstruct relevance on demand and avoid context loss entirely.
Get the whitepaper
If you want immediate access to the full mechanism and implementation templates, enter your email below and I’ll send you the complete PDF.
The architectural solution: SR-SI
The core principle of Simulated Recall via Shallow Indexing is straightforward:
Stop expecting the model to remember everything.
Instead, require it to recall only the essential, verified context.
SR-SI works by instructing the model to maintain a single, compact document under 2,000 tokens, the Shallow Index, which contains the:
- project constraints
- file locations
- architectural decisions
- purpose statements
- working rules
Before generating any code or making any decision, the model consults this index.
This lookup step gives the system a consistent structural anchor and prevents drift, even in long-running projects.
Empirical findings: a structural upgrade
I measured the performance difference between a legacy conversational workflow and the SR-SI Retrofit. The results were significant:
Net efficiency gain
An 85.5% reduction in the Net Token Efficiency Ratio, which measures the token cost required to keep the AI focused per line of code.
The drop from 2.56 → 0.37 tokens per line marks a substantial architectural improvement.
Sustained longevity
The traditional workflow failed around 200 prompts.
With SR-SI, coherence remained stable beyond 1,000 prompts with zero re-explanations.
Zero-cost documentation
Because the model maintains the index and related files as part of the workflow, the process naturally produces consistent, high-quality documentation, eliminating manual overhead entirely.
These findings indicate that SR-SI is not a prompt trick, but an architectural pattern that changes how the model orients itself.
Join the validation phase
This work is still a working theory.
The numbers are strong, but they come from a single source: my own production projects.
For SR-SI to mature into a validated best practice, it needs independent replication.
The whitepaper provides:
- full dataset
- detailed methodology
- comparative metrics
- implementation templates
If you’re working with long-running AI workflows, I invite you to test the methodology in your own environment and contribute to the validation effort.
